|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
New On The Network Today
This feed is published daily with selected new or updated
content from across our network. For a list of network sites, many of
which feature daily news, see below. |
| |
| 02/09 New
Lowtax Editor Column, by Kitty Miv |
| 01/09 International
Privacy and Security, Investors Offshore special feature |
| 31/08
Lowtax Belize, annual update |
| 27/08
IRS To Drop UBS Lawsuit, Tax-News.com |
| 26/08 New
Lowtax Editor Column, by Kitty Miv |
| 25/08 New
PBTG Editor Column, Caroline, PBTG editor |
| 24/08
Uruguay Stays On OECD Grey List, Tax-News.com |
| 23/08 Don't
Forget Doha, And I Don't Mean The Tennis, Jeremy Hetherington-Gore
blog entry |
| 20/08
Ireland Plans Social Security Overhaul, Tax-News.com |
| 19/08 New
Lowtax Editor Column, by Kitty Miv |
| 18/08 New
PBTG Editor Column, Caroline, PBTG editor |
| 17/06
Lowtax Cayman Islands, annual update |
| 16/08
Germany's Fiscal Court Seeks Property Tax Reform, Tax-News.com |
| 13/08 Jurisdiction
Special Focus: Antigua and Barbuda, Investors Offshore special feature |
| 12/08 New
Lowtax Editor Column, by Kitty Miv |
| 11/08 New
PBTG Editor Column, Caroline, PBTG editor |
| 10/08 Brazil
Cuts Import Tariffs, Tax-News.com |
| 09/08 Ukraine
Tax Code Published, Tax-News.com |
| 06/08
France Plans Reform Of Property Tax Credit, Tax-News.com |
| 04/08 New
PBTG Editor Column, Caroline, PBTG editor |
| 02/08 Islamic
Finance - The New Mainstream Alternative, Investors Offshore special
feature |
| 28/07 New
PBTG Editor Column, Caroline, PBTG editor |
| 27/07 UK
Launches Raft Of Tax Consultations, Tax-News.com |
| 26/07 Fat
Tax On The Menu , Jeremy Hetherington-Gore blog entry |
| 23/07 Sarkozy
Seeks 'Fiscal Convergence' With Germany, Tax-News.com |
| 20/07 Singapore
Base For Tuvalu OIFC, Tax-News.com |
| 15/07 St
Vincent & The Grenadines, Investors Offshore special feature |
13/07 Tax-
News.com Jersey Review 2010-2011 |
| 12/07 Goodbye
To All That, Jeremy Hetherington-Gore blog entry |
06/07 Hong
Kong Full PBTG Guide, added to Personal Business Tax Guide |
| 28/06
Lowtax Dubai, annual update |
| 18/06 Singapore
- Another Hong Kong?, Investors Offshore special feature |
| 15/06 Swiss
Parliament Approves UBS Agreement, Tax-News.com |
08/06 Dubai
Full PBTG Guide, added to Personal Business Tax Guide |
| 04/06
Lowtax Panama, annual update |
| 01/06
Lowtax Luxembourg, annual update |
03/03
Personal Business
Tax Guide, PBTG, has launched! |
 |
| Providing essential tax news and information for globally
mobile artists, contractors, entrepreneurs, professionals, small businesses,
sportspersons and entertainers. |
| |
|
| |
| Lowtax Network Sites |
| Lowtax Network Portal:
'Low-tax' business and investment in the top 50 jurisdictions covered in
exceptional detail. |
| Tax News: Global
tax news, continuously updated through the day. |
| Investors Offshore:
The independent offshore and alternative investment guide for expatriates
and the globally aware investor. Sponsored by HSBC
Bank International. |
| Law & Tax
News: Daily news and background data on tax and legal developments
for international business. |
| Offshore-e-com:
A topical guide to offshore e-commerce focused on tax and regulation. |
| Lowtax Library:
One of the web's largest and most authoritative business and investment
information sources. |
| US Tax Network:
The resource for free online US taxation information, covering: corporate
tax, individual tax, international tax, expatriates, sales and e-commerce
tax, investment tax. |
| NEW! Personal
Business Tax Guide: Providing essential tax news and information
on business for contractors, entrepreneurs, professionals, small businesses,
artists, sportspersons and entertainers. |
| |
|
|
|
Table
of Statutes
This
is a non-exhaustive list of the main Guernsey statutes affecting
offshore and non-resident business. The statutes are listed
in alphabetical order click on the statute for a fuller
description of the statute or the legal regime it forms part
of:
Banking Supervision (Bailiwick of Guernsey) (Amendment) Law,
2003
Collective Investment Scheme Rules 1988
Companies (Guernsey) Law 1994
Companies
(Guernsey) Law 2008
Company Security (Insider Dealing) (Guernsey) Law 1996
Criminal Justice (Proceeds of Crime) (Bailiwick of Guernsey)
Regulations, 2002
Financial Services Commission (Guernsey) Law 1986
Gambling
(Betting) (Alderney) Ordinance 1999
Guarantee Companies Ordinance
1997
Immigration Act 1991 (UK)
Income Tax (Guernsey)
Law 1975
Insurance Business (Guernsey) Law 1986
Insurance Business (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2002
Insurance Managers and Insurance Intermediaries (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Law, 2002
Limited Partnerships (Guernsey)
Law 1995
Migration of Companies Ordinance
1997
Partnership (Guernsey) Law
1995
Protected Cell Companies Ordinance 1997
Protected
Cell Companies (Special Purpose Vehicle) Regulations 2001
Protection of Investors (Guernsey)
Law 1987
Trusts Law (Guernsey) 1989
Trusts
(Guernsey) Law, 2007
Regulation of Fiduciaries and Administration Businesses (Guernsey)
Law 2000
BACK
TO TOP
In
April 2009, it was announced that Guernsey had launched
the Island’s first legal resources website. The site
is the result of a joint initiative between Guernsey’s
Royal Court and the Law Officers of the Crown and provides
access to a comprehensive collection and database of Guernsey’s
legal material:
-
Guernsey
laws, including consolidated versions and recent changes
-
Unreported judgements
-
Guernsey Law Reports
-
Guernsey Law Journal and the Jersey and Guernsey Law Review
“The
launch of this site is an extremely positive development
for Guernsey as a leading international finance centre,”
said Peter Niven, Chief Executive of Guernsey Finance –
the promotional agency for the Island’s finance industry
– said at the time.
“Guernsey
prides itself on having modern legislation, especially for
financial services like the new Trusts Law and new Company
Law that we introduced last year and we now have all this
available in a user-friendly online resources centre."
“Having
such a comprehensive ‘one stop shop’ will make
accessing materials a much more streamlined process for
anyone wanting information on Guernsey’s legal framework.
The resources will be of particular benefit to lawyers and
other intermediaries who now at the touch of a button will
be able to see exactly what Guernsey can offer their clients.”
Guernsey
features alongside the likes of the United Kingdom and the
United States on the OECD’s ‘white list’
that was published at the conclusion of the G20 summit in
London at the start of April and was ranked 12th in that
year's Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) which was published
in March 2009.
Guernsey
Money Laundering Law
Also
see below under Banking.
In
its Annual Report for 2003, the Guernsey Financial Services
Commission (GFSC) drew attention to the publication during
the year of the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) report
on the Bailiwick's financial regulation and criminal justice
framework, revealing that Guernsey was assessed by the IMF
to have a high level of compliance with international standards
of regulation in banking, insurance, securities, trust and
company service provision, anti-money laundering and combating
the financing of terrorism.
Additionally,
the report announced that during 2003, the Commission was
involved in a number of initiatives with industry, working
to ensure that the Bailiwick maintains its competitive edge
whilst adhering to recognised standards. Director general
of the GFSC, Peter Neville observed that: "2003 was a very
good year for the Commission. We received an excellent IMF
report, which commended our high regulatory standards. These
same standards were cited by Robert Finch, the Lord Mayor
of the City of London, as good reason to do business with
the Island and he acknowledged that we stand alongside the
City in terms of our integrity, innovation and standards
of service."
In
March, 2004, the Financial Services Commission issued a
statement on anti-money laundering standards for existing
customers following the issue of revised Recommendations
by the Financial Action Task Force in 2003. The statement
requires financial services businesses to assess the risk
of each business relationship and to make sure that they
have customer due diligence information appropriate to the
level of risk.
It allows businesses in the financial services sector to
consider whether simplified or reduced information is appropriate
for low risk businesses and lower risk customers. This could
mean for example, locally resident retail customers who
have a relationship which is understood by the financial
services business.
"The
Commission has worked with the Guernsey Joint Money Laundering
Steering Group, which contains representatives from across
the finance sector, in developing this new statement,” explained
Peter Neville. “The
statement extends the existing flexibility provided by the
Commission's Guidance Notes on the Prevention of Money Laundering
and emphasises that unnecessary demands on lower risk customers
should be avoided," he added.
The Commission said that it was not issuing more detailed
recommendations at that stage on how the FATF standard should
be applied in practice. It further announced that it intended
to consult with industry by way of observation during on-site
visits and by way of discussions, to develop such recommendations
for inclusion in the revised Guidance Notes. A revised version
of the Guidance Notes was to be issued only after full consultation
with industry and the other Crown Dependencies.
Following
discussions between the IMF and the Commission at the end
of 2008, it was agreed that the IMF would undertake its
assessment of the Bailiwick of Guernsey late in 2009. This
assessment was originally scheduled to take place in January
2009, but the IMF took into account the severe effects of
the global crisis, including the problems experienced at
Northern Rock Guernsey and Landsbanki Guernsey.
The areas to be covered by the assessment were unchanged.
A significant aspect was to do with the stability of Guernsey’s
financial sector. It was also to cover banking, insurance
and investment sector supervisory legislation and practice,
together with anti-money laundering and counter terrorist
financing legislation and its implementation.
Peter Neville, Director General of the Commission said:
“The Commission is eager to participate in the IMF’s
assessment process and looks forward to the broader perspective
a later assessment will bring. For substantially more than
a year we have been presented with significant challenges
in crisis management. We have met these challenges. The
very positive findings of the inquiry by Michael Foot of
the Promontory group into the role played by the Commission
in the Landsbanki Guernsey case should stand Guernsey in
good stead."
He
added: "We hope that one of the outcomes of the IMF’s
future assessments will be the pulling together of the lessons
learned by supervisors around the world during the crisis.
Here in Guernsey the response has already included the introduction
of a depositor compensation scheme. The hard look that Guernsey
will be taking at the nature of its banking sector and the
relationship between the financial industry in Guernsey
and its counterparts in the UK will also be relevant to
the IMF’s assessment. The IMF will want to gauge the
effects of the financial crisis and the global economic
downturn on the shape of the finance industry and the products
and services it offers.”
In
December 2008, a new regulation was introduced in Guernsey
to prevent money laundering, which restricts the sale or
purchase in the course of certain businesses of precious
metals, precious stones or jewellery, where the payment
is made in cash and exceeds GBP10,000. These regulations
were proposed by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission,
which sought to extend the Bailiwick’s anti-money
laundering regime in order for it to meet international
standards.
The
Regulations are made under Sections 49A and 54 of the Criminal
Justice (Proceeds of Crime) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
1999 and are titled The Criminal Justice (Proceeds of Crime)
(Restriction on Cash Transactions)(Bailiwick of Guernsey)
Regulations, 2008 and were effective from December 1, 2008.
Any person who contravenes the restriction commits an offence
and is liable, for a first offence, to a fine of up to twice
the value of the cash involved. The Guernsey government
has asked that dealers in precious metals, precious stones
or jewellery should report any attempted transactions in
excess of GBP10,000 as suspicious to Guernsey’s Financial
Intelligence Service.
In
December 2009, the Guernsey Financial Services Commission
proposed changes to its AML/CFT that will require postage
stamp dealers, bullion dealers, firms of accountants which
are currently not registered with the Commission, and firms
(including sole practitioners) of insolvency practitioners,
auditors and tax advisors to register with the Commission
and to comply with the AML/CFT regulations, and with the
rules in the Commission’s handbooks.
As
the Commission is conscious that the requirements of the
regulations may appear complex and onerous, especially to
firms which have not previously been subject to any form
of AML/CFT regulation or supervision, the guidance note
provides information to assist such firms.
The
guidance paper, available on the Commission’s website,
provides a simplified overview of the requirements of the
regulations and the rules in the Handbooks.
In
April 2010, the Guernsey FSC announced the launch of a consultation
on proposals to overhaul legislation that governs the prevention
of money laundering and the financing of terrorism in the
island.
The
consultation paper proposes extensive amendments, namely
to the following legislation:
-
The
Financial Services Commission (Site Visits) (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Ordinance, 2008;
-
The Insurance Business (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2002;
-
The Insurance Managers and Insurance Intermediaries (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Law, 2002;
-
The Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
1987;
-
The Banking Supervision (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1994;
-
The Registration of Non-Regulated Financial Services Businesses
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2008;
-
The Regulation of Fiduciaries, Administration Businesses
and Company Directors, etc. (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
2000;
-
The Criminal Justice (Proceeds of Crime) (Financial Services
Businesses) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Regulations, 2007;
and
-
The Criminal Justice (Proceeds of Crime) (Legal Professionals,
Accountants and Estate Agents) (Bailiwick of Guernsey)
Regulations, 2008.
The
first part of the consultation discusses harmonizing the
Commission’s on-site inspection powers throughout
all governing legislation.
The
definition of “regulatory laws” is also to be
amended to provide a consistent definition across governing
legislation. In particular this will improve the Commission’s
checks when considering a license, by broadening the pool
of relevant contraventions of regulatory laws that the Commission
may take into account when considering an application.
It
is also proposed that a textual amendment be made to legislation
which governs penalties, namely harmonizing the texts of
Section 88 of the Insurance Business Law, 2002 and Section
65 of the Insurance Managers and Insurance Intermediaries
Law, 2002.
In
addition, as part of a larger review of the definition of
“FSB Regulations,” the Commission proposes inserting
a new provision into the FSB Regulations which enables financial
services businesses to disclose information to other financial
services businesses and prescribed businesses, where it
appears necessary for the purposes of forestalling, preventing
or detecting money laundering and terrorist financing. This
amendment is supported by the recommendation in recent IMF
reports of other jurisdictions that they should consider
including explicit provisions to provide for the sharing
of information between financial services businesses.
The
consultation paper is available on the Commission’s
website, and interest parties were asked to submit comments
by May 21, 2010.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey
Trust Law
The
Trusts Law 1989 provides a modern statutory basis for trust
management activity. The Edwards Report acknowledged that
Guernsey ranks highly among IOFCs for the quality of its
regulation. Unlike the banking sector, however, the Guernsey
trusts industry has not been subject to any formal system
of supervision.
Partly
as a result of the Edwards Report, a law was prepared by
the States' Advisory and Finance Committee under the name
of The Regulation of Fiduciaries and Administration Businesses
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Bill 2000. The law - known as the
Fiduciary Law - came into effect on April 1, 2001.
Anyone
who, by way of business, carries on regulated fiduciary
activities in or from within the Bailiwick of Guernsey requires
a fiduciary licence granted by the Commission under the
Fiduciary Law. Section 2 of the Fiduciary Law sets out the
activities which are regulated, and section 3 provides for
exemption in some circumstances.
A licence is required by any company, wherever registered,
providing fiduciary services in the Bailiwick and by Guernsey-registered
companies providing fiduciary services anywhere in the world.
There are two categories of fiduciary licence:
-
A full fiduciary licence can only be granted to a company
or a partnership, and authorises all regulated fiduciary
activities. A full fiduciary licence authorises the
licensee and its directors or partners, managers and
employees to carry on regulated fiduciary activities
(where the directors, etc. do so in the course of their
duties to the licensee).
-
A personal fiduciary licence can only be granted to
an individual and authorises the holder to carry on
a restricted range of fiduciary activities. Those include
acting as a company director, as trustee (but not as
a sole trustee), and as executor of a will or administrator
of an estate. The holder of a personal fiduciary licence
is prohibited from advertising by The Regulation of
Fiduciaries (Fiduciary Advertisements and Annual Returns)
Regulations, 2001.
The
law contains a 'four eyes' rule, standards for capital adequacy
and compulsory indemnity insurance. The offer or provision
of fiduciary services without a licence incurs criminal
sanctions. Prudential rules are also imposed; clients' funds
need to be segregated from other trust assets; and new accounting
safeguards have been installed.
The
law provides extensive powers to the Guernsey Financial
Services Committee in the granting, refusal, revocation,
and application of conditions to fiduciary licences. It
also has authority to control the names of, and advertising
by, fiduciary businesses, rights to obtain information and
documents, and powers to conduct investigations.
The Guernsey law of trusts was codified in 1989 along broadly
Anglo-Saxon lines in the Trusts (Guernsey) Law 1989. This
law does not apply directly in Alderney or Sark, but has
a substantial influence on trusts in those jurisdictions.
Trust
documents are in English. There are no registration requirements
for trusts, no fees are payable on formation, and there
are no annual reporting requirements other than for resident
trusts (ie those with resident beneficiaries). Trust accounts
must be kept but there is no audit requirement.
The
maximum perpetuity for Guernsey trusts is 100 years. The
law provides for non-recognition of foreign judgements,
and forced heirship provisions in foreign law can be over-ridden.
The Hague Convention has been incorporated into Manx Law.
In
September 2005, the Guernsey FSC launched a consultation
with trust professionals, lawyers, accountants and regulators
to: investigate the requirement for changes to enable new
trust products and services to be available to the Fiduciary
Sector in Guernsey; to consider the availability of competitor
trust products and services from other jurisdictions; to
consider marketing requirement for the Fiduciary Sector;
and to make recommendations for the desired changes.
New
trust legislation (the Trusts (Guernsey) Law, 2007), which
was approved in July 2007, came into force on March 17th,
2008. The changes overall are designed to create a more
flexible framework for the local trust industry, and to
ensure that Guernsey, as a jurisdiction for the establishment
and administration of fiduciary structures, remains well
placed and competitive.
Some
of the most significant changes to the Island’s trust
legislation include:
-
The introduction of (non-charitable) Purpose Trusts;
-
Removal of limits on the length of a trust’s duration
– allowing perpetual trusts;
-
Clarification of the position of retiring trustees, making
the transfer process more streamlined;
-
Clarification of the circumstances under which information
has to be given to beneficiaries;
-
Abolition of the liability of directors of corporate trustees
based in Guernsey or acting as trustees of Guernsey law
trusts, particularly as a way to encourage greater use
of Private Trust Companies (PTCs); and
-
Revision of arrangements regarding limitation periods
and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).
The
new law has its roots in a series of proposals made in
the ‘Evans Report’, which was published following
a root and branch review of the Island’s trust legislation
by a working party under the chairmanship of Guernsey
advocate Rupert Evans.
“This
is yet another example of how the Guernsey government,
the Island’s financial regulator and its industry
practitioners, continually work together to maintain an
environment that maximises business flows,” stated
Peter Niven, Chief Executive of GuernseyFinance.
Guernsey
has more than 50 years experience in providing trust and
corporate services. As of February 2008, the Island hosted
more than 140 licensed fiduciaries, ranging from large
organisations to independent, boutique operations. Together,
they held between GBP200 and GBP300bn worth of assets
in trust.
Mr
Niven added that: “Guernsey’s fiduciary industry
has built a reputation for professionalism and expertise
in using the modern structures that are available on the
Island for the preservation of both institutional and
individual/family wealth and assets. The amendments to
Guernsey’s trust legislation include several significant
changes like the introduction of Purpose Trusts that will
particularly enhance the Island’s fiduciary environment."
He
concluded: “However, we are far from resting on
our laurels and work continues to introduce legislation
that will allow the establishment of Foundations. The
addition of this innovative tool will ensure that the
Island’s practitioners are able to offer their internationally
mobile clients the widest spectrum of products and services.”
In
July 2009, Guernsey's Financial Services Commission announced
proposals to overhaul regulation to enhance protection
and oversight of Retirement Annuity Trust Schemes.
Retirement
Annuity Trust Schemes (RATS) have been available as a
form of personal pension provision in Guernsey for many
years. Recently, with other options such as retirement
annuity contracts becoming less widely available, RATS
have been formed in larger numbers.
Their
flexibility in relation to how assets may be invested,
and benefits drawn on retirement, makes them useful in
many circumstances. However, the same flexibility gives
rise to the risk of RATS being used in circumstances where
they are not the best solution or are not fully understood
by the member.
The
Commission fears that due to the cross-sectoral involvement
in the schemes, regulatory framework, which applies to
the firms which operate in different sectors but provide
services in relation to the same structure or product,
needs revision to set broader, more effective, guidelines.
In
late 2008 the Commission circulated a discussion paper
on RATS, highlighting some concerns about the present
position. This arose from discussions with a group of
practitioners across the relevant sectors of finance business.
The problems identified by the group included:
-
The
quality of initial advice: there are concerns that not
all firms involved in RATS understand the specific factors
and requirements which apply to them. There has sometimes
been insufficient analysis of existing pension arrangements
and the merits of transferring out of those into a Retirement
and Annuity Trust Scheme.
-
There has sometimes been inadequate disclosure of fees
and charges. Those have a particular significance with
RATS because they are comparatively expensive to administer
and clients need to be able to factor that into their
decisions. There have also been problems with the disclosure
of commission and investment performance, it informed.
-
There have been issues with the expertise of some firms
to advise on suitable assets to ensure that Income Tax
requirements for RATS are met, and that the investments
are suitable to allow benefits to be drawn down on retirement.
-
A particular problem relating to investment policies
pursued within RATS has been the use of heavy gearing
(borrowing) by trustees of RATS, with the serious risks
involved not always being clear to the RATS’ members.
The
Commission reportedly received some very helpful responses
to the discussion paper. It was clear to the Commission,
both from the number, and the content of those, that there
is widespread concern about the above areas within firms
across all sectors of the finance industry.
As
a result, the Commission produced a consultation paper
summarizing its proposals for improving the regulatory
framework under which firms provide services relating
to RATS.
The
Commission’s proposed rules include:
-
Training
for those advising and acting as trustee of or administering
RATS;
-
At set up stage, a trustee accepting trusteeship must
be certain that the RATS and the proposed investment
and investment strategy is a suitable form of retirement
provision for the member;
-
Before transferring funds from a defined benefit pension
scheme to a RATS, the trustee must produce an impartially
verified report showing that the RATS would be more
financially beneficial over the existing set-up;
-
Trustees must make the member aware of the risks of
using gearing to enhance investment, and the trustee
must get the member to sign a copy of the statement,
stipulated within the Commission’s guidance note,
underlining that they understand the risks;
-
Trustees must report full financial reports of the RATS
financial standing to the member at least annually;
-
The trustee must ensure that, once income starts to
be drawn down and paid to the member in the form of
an annuity, the trustee can demonstrate that the level
of payment is appropriate to secure a satisfactory provision
for the retirement of the member, but also that reviews
are carried out to ensure that the amount annuitized
remains appropriate with respect the amount remaining
in the RATS, and the life expectancy of the member;
-
A trustee must make fully transparent what its fees
and commissions are, with regards assets at any level,
including not limited to trustee’s own fees and
fees or commissions payable from the assets to the trustee,
any independent financial advisor, other intermediary,
investment or fund manager or adviser.
-
No financial services business licensed by the Commission
shall inaccurately or misleadingly advertise or promote
RATS, or investments or investment strategies (including
gearing) for use as part of retirement provision involving
RATS. The Commission's proposals are listed comprehensively
on its site, where responses will be welcome until September
2, 2009.
For
the taxation of trusts in Guernsey see Offshore Legal and Tax Regimes.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey
Banking Law
Banks
are registered in Guernsey under the Banking Supervision
(Guernsey) Law 1994 as amended in 2003, which is administered
by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission. Applications
from new banks are carefully vetted both from a prudential
point of view and commercially.
The
Banking Law has three main objectives:
- To
protect depositors;
- To protect
the reputation of Guernsey as an International banking
centre;
- To protect
the best economic interests of Guernsey.
It
contains capital adequacy rules which are stiffer than the
Basle requirements.
In
November 2001 the Financial Services Commission announced
that it would be applying customer 'due diligence' standards
according to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's
"Customer Due Diligence for Banks" paper (4 October
2001, "the CDD paper").
Section
2.2.3 of the CDD paper sets out what the Commission now
regards as best practice for banks on introduced business.
The criteria listed under paragraph 36 include the recommendation
that "all relevant identification data and other documentation
pertaining to the customer's identity should be immediately
submitted by the introducer to the bank, who must carefully
review the documentation provided. Such information must
be available for review by the supervisor and the Financial
Intelligence Service or equivalent enforcement agency, where
appropriate legal authority has been obtained."
Under
Regulation 1(4)(a) of the Criminal Justice (Proceeds of
Crime) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Regulations, 1999, in determining
whether a person carrying on any financial service businesses
in the Bailiwick of Guernsey is in compliance with the regulations,
a court may take account of "the Guidance Notes on
the Prevention of Money Laundering issued from time to time
by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission and any other
guidance issued, adopted or approved by the said Commission."
The
Commission said its announcement represented guidance issued
by the Commission for the purposes of Regulation 1(4)(a)
mentioned above.
In
early 2002 the Guernsey FSC, along with its peers in Jersey
and the Isle of Man announced new measures to tighten anti-money
laundering regimes.
The new measures included three main features:
- In
addition to being required to know their own customers,
banks and other institutions will be required to look
beyond their customers (for example, when they are trusts
or companies) to establish the principals behind them.
-
The new measures tighten up the requirements on banks
and other institutions to ensure that due diligence
is done properly - even where the customer is referred
to them by another institution which claims to have
carried out the background checks already.
-
All institutions will be required to embark upon a progressive
risk prioritised programme to bring the records of existing
accounts up to current standards (where there are deficiencies
in information and documentation held) if the nature
of the client or transaction meets certain criteria.
In
December, 2003, the FSC responded to concerns raised by
the jurisdictions financial services sector by clarifying
kyc rules for 'introduced business' following the introduction
of the FATF's revised 'Forty Recommendations' which included
rules comparable to the Basle rules but administratively
somewhat simpler.
The
FSC said: "Accordingly, from the date of this statement,
the Commission will adopt the standard embodied in FATF
Recommendation 9 (see below) with regard to the provision
of information to financial services businesses in respect
of introduced business. As a minimum, financial services
businesses should receive written confirmation from the
introducer, by way of a certificate or summary sheet(s),
detailing the necessary information and the documentation
held by the introducer and also take adequate steps to satisfy
themselves that copies of the necessary information specified
in FATF Recommendation 9, will be made available upon request
without delay."
"The
Commission expects that financial services businesses should
have a programme of testing to ensure that introducers are
able to fulfil the requirement that relevant documentation
can be made available upon request without delay. This will
involve financial services businesses adopting ongoing procedures
to ensure they have the means to obtain that information
and documentation."
"In
order to determine that the new standard is being applied,
the Commission, during its on-site visits, will seek to
verify that financial services businesses have obtained
the necessary information by way of a certificate or summary
sheet(s) and that the requirement for copies of such identification
data and other relevant documentation to be made available
upon request without delay has been tested."
"It
should be noted that, ultimately, the responsibility for
customer identification and verification will remain, as
always, with the financial services business relying on
the introducer."
In
August 2008, the GFSC issued a consultation paper to members
of the Association of Guernsey Banks to seek their views
on proposals to amend several key areas of regulatory policy
and to introduce a range of measures aimed at safeguarding
retail depositors.
The
proposals, contained in the paper 'Consultation on Parental
Upstreaming and the Introduction of Depositor Protection
and Ombudsman Schemes,' aim to reinforce Guernsey’s
reputation as a mature and well regulated finance centre.
The consultation closed on September 15, 2008.
Peter
Neville, Director General of the Commission explained:
“The
review has its origins in the 'credit crunch' and more specifically
in the problems experienced by the Guernsey subsidiary of
Northern Rock plc prior to its transfer into public ownership.
"That
episode led us to consider the vulnerabilities inherent
in a banking model that is widely used in Guernsey, which
involves gathering retail deposits and then lending a large
proportion of those funds to the parent bank – what
we call 'upstreaming'. The Northern Rock case also highlighted
the fact that we do not have a deposit protection scheme
to protect people who put their money with banks based here."
In
order to provide greater protection for retail depositors
the GSFC proposes to reduce parental upstreaming to a maximum
of 85% of total assets. The Commission may also impose further
restrictions based on the level of perceived risk associated
with the parent bank.
The
regulator also wants to discourage the use of branch structures
for new licensed banks, unless they are perceived to be
systemically important at least in their home jurisdiction
or are highly specialised in nature, and introduce a deposit
protection scheme limited to a maximum of GBP35,000 per
individual depositor and to retail depositors only.
The
GFSC says its proposals would strengthen the banking sector
by requiring greater transparency through disclosure by
individual banks to their depositors of: the existence (or
otherwise) in the jurisdiction of a deposit protection scheme;
the existence or possibility of parental upstreaming; and
the status and nature of support extended by the parent
to the local bank.
Other
proposals would:
-
require banks to monitor the liquidity and solvency of
the parent entity when they place funds with it;
-
require banks to have in place a contingency plan to withdraw
some or all upstreaming without destabilising the parent;
-
impose stronger corporate governance arrangements through
the requirement for at least one independent non-group
non-executive director on the Boards of local banks; and
-
introduce an ombudsman scheme. Such a scheme would not
be limited to the customers of banks and therefore this
proposal will require further consultation with other
regulated financial services sectors in Guernsey. The
Commission believes that the introduction of such a scheme
will afford further safeguards to depositors and customers
generally.
The
consultation paper sets out the benefits that would flow
to Guernsey from having a deposit protection scheme and
addresses the costs associated with a scheme which would
be funded by the banking sector.
The
views of the banking sector are also being sought on the
possible establishment of an ombudsman scheme to resolve
complaints from members of the public who have suffered
losses or have other grievances.
"The
way forward which is being suggested would involve limiting
the costs by having the Commission provide resources to
support an ombudsman in a way which did not conflict with
our supervisory and regulatory responsibilities," Neville
added.
"Once
we have received the responses to the paper on the proposed
ombudsman scheme, we will consider extending the consultation
process to the other parts of the finance sector,"
he concluded.
A
Guidance Note providing additional Guidance on certain sections
of the Banking Supervision (Bailiwick of Guernsey) (Amendment
Law), 2003 with regards up streaming was published by the
Guernsey FSC in January 2010 and is available on the Commission's
website.
In
April 2010, the Guernsey Financial Services Commission published
the final draft of new Capital Adequacy Rules, mandatory
for all entities licensed under the Protection of Investors
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law 1987. The release of the Rules
in the their final form is the culmination of a November
2009 consultation.
The
Capital Adequacy Rules became effective on April 16, 2010,
but contain transitional rules that allow licensees until
June 30, 2010, to meet the requirements.
The
Guernsey FSC has released details on the following rule
changes:
-
Capital
Adequacy Requirements for Designated Managers administered
by another firm: Several respondents asked whether,
for designated managers administered by another licensee,
the Capital Adequacy Rules should be relaxed. The respondents
were concerned about barriers to entry. The Commission
no longer has the power, or the duty, under section 4
of the Law to consider economic benefit for licence applicants.
The Commission, in arriving at these Capital Adequacy
Rules, has considered the general risks that it considers
licensees are exposed to. The risk for such licensees
is in being a designated manager; the Commission does
not recognise a distinction between an administered designated
manager and one with its own staff and premises.
-
Use
of Carry Value for adjustments at Rule 5: The
Commission has been made aware that the concept of carry
value is more appropriate than market value. This is because,
under certain GAAP provisions, some assets are carried
at cost in the balance sheet. The Commission does not
wish to force companies to apply market value or fair
value where they are not required to under GAAP. Therefore
the Commission has accepted this point.
-
Inter-Company
Group Loans: The Commission received significant
feedback about the disallowing of inter-company group
loan debtors. Some respondents suggested to the FSC that
this might be appropriate in cases where capital is then
placed outside the Bailiwick of Guernsey but should not
apply where the debtor is another company domiciled in
Guernsey. The FSC considers that this is not an appropriate
principle on which to negotiate. It has been regulators’
experience that such arrangements lead to a recycling
of capital that disguises, maybe unintentionally, insufficient
cover to the group as a whole, the FSC said.
-
Counterparty
Risk: The absence of a definition of counterparty
risk provided a major problem for respondents. Whilst
the Capital Adequacy Rules have been designed to protect
licensees from an over-exposure to any single counterparty
they were not designed to capture balances with counterparties
for every outstanding bargain or trade. Consequently,
the Capital Adequacy Rules now exclude outstanding trades
unsettled for 15 days or less from the Counterparty Risk
computation. In addition, respondents were concerned that
cash held at bank would also be captured under counterparty
risk. The Commission has accepted this concern: any cash
held at bank with a term of less than 90 days should be
excluded from the Counterparty Risk computation, the new
rules state.
- Matching
of Fees Payable and Receivable: Lastly, respondents
expressed concern at the inclusion of fees payable (which
were directly attributable to fees receivable) in expenditure
for the purposes of calculating the Financial Resources
Requirement. The Commission has accepted this inclusion
did not reflect the behaviour of such businesses and therefore
the risks of undercapitalisation. Such fees payable are
now excluded from the Financial Resources Requirement (and
Liquidity Requirement) calculation.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey
Insurance Companies
Insurance companies are regulated by the Financial Services
Commission under the Insurance Business (Guernsey) Law 1986,
updated by the Insurance Business (Bailiwick of Guernsey)
Law, 2002, the Insurance Managers and Insurance Intermediaries
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2002, the Insurance Business
(Bailiwick of Guernsey) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2008, and
the Protected Cell Companies Ordinance 1997.
The
minimum capital requirement of a licensed insurance manager
or a licensed insurance intermediary is GBP25,000 or 125%
of the licensee’s professional indemnity insurance
deductible or excess, if higher; a fee of GBP4,070 is payable
on registration and GBP3,860 annually thereafter (for a
'Pure' insurance manager. Commercial insurance managers
pay an annual fee of GBP6,460. These fees are effective
as of January 1, 2010.
Annual
audits are needed, and there are substantial annual information
requirements, including business plans, solvency calculations,
reports on claims, banking and investment schedules, and,
for life companies, actuarial certification.
In
March 2010, it was announced that Heritage Insurance Management
in Guernsey had achieved a worldwide first by amalgamating
two Protected Cell Companies (PCCs).
The
companies, Harlequin Insurance PCC Limited and Friary Court
Insurance PCC Limited, are both insurance PCCs with 17 independently
owned cells between them.
The
companies were used by Heritage and Heath Lambert Insurance
Management (Guernsey) Limited (now merged) to provide cell
captive insurance facilities to their clients. It was decided
that amalgamating the two PCC companies into one would create
a more efficient structure which ultimately will save money
for the clients involved in the cells.
Speaking
about the amalgamation, Martin Le Pelley, Compliance Officer
for Heritage, said at the time that: “The amalgamation
of two PCCs is not straightforward as each cell represents
a separate class of share, which in turn means that all
cell shareholders must vote in favour of the amalgamation
in order for it to take place. Nevertheless, having achieved
this milestone, we consider that the combined company will
provide a more secure and efficient platform for our cell
captive clients going forward.”
The
combined company has retained the name Harlequin Insurance
PCC Ltd.
Insurance
companies can choose between various bases of taxation,
see Offshore Legal and Tax Regimes
and Offshore
Business Sectors.
BACK
TO TOP
Guernsey Investment Funds
Collective
Investment Funds are supervised by the Financial Services
Commission (FSC) under the Protection of Investors (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Law, 1987 (as amended) and the Collective
Investment Scheme Rules 1988.
Open
ended funds may be established as Class A, B or Q funds
and are constituted as companies, protected cell companies
or unit trusts. Closed ended investment funds are constituted
as companies, unit trusts, limited partnerships or protected
cell companies.
Open
ended schemes are authorised and entities involved in
controlled investment business are licensed under the
Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law,
1987, as amended. The Commission has made a number of
rules under the Law which set out the detailed requirements
to be followed by all authorised schemes and licensees.
These include:
-
The
Collective Investment Schemes Rules 2002 (which cover
Class A schemes); The Collective Investment Schemes
(Class B) Rules 1990 (which cover Class B schemes);
-
The
Collective Investment Schemes Qualifying Professional
Investors (Class Q) Rules 1998 (which cover schemes
designed for qualifying professional investors);
-
The
Collective Investment Schemes (Designated Persons)
Rules 1988;
-
The
Licensees (Conduct of Business and Notification)(Non-Guernsey
Schemes) Rules 1994.
Class
A schemes are those which meet the Commission's Collective
Investment Schemes Rules 2002 and are therefore eligible
for recognition by the UK Financial Services Authority
for sale to the public in the United Kingdom under section
270 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
The
rules for Class B schemes incorporate a measure of flexibility.
This policy recognises that Class B schemes range from
the retail fund aimed at the "general public"
via institutional funds to the strictly private fund
established solely as a vehicle for investment by a
single institution. Their investment objectives and
risk profiles are similarly wide-ranging.
The
Class Q Rules seek to provide a clear and concise set
of requirements for the operation of professional investor
funds and have been designed to encourage innovation.
A
Qualifying Investor Fund (QIF) regime was Introduced
following consultation with the financial services industry
in the latter half of 2004, and was welcomed by the
island's fund industry. Under a streamlined application
process, the Commission undertakes to grant fund approval
within 3 working days provided that an appropriately
licensed Guernsey applicant has certified that: the
fund will be restricted to professional, experienced
and knowledgeable investors; the applicant has conducted
due diligence on the promoter and associated parties
and has found them to be fit and proper; and the applicant
is satisfied as to the fund's economic rationale and
the disclosure of any risks associated with the investment
vehicle.
New
criteria for Qualifying Investor Funds released by the
Guernsey Financial Services Commission in 2006 met with
support from the island’s finance industry.
Chief
executive of GuernseyFinance, Peter Niven, suggested
that the move "will serve to bring more business to
the island", whilst Chairman of the Guernsey Investment
Fund Association, Mike de Haaff, announced that:
"GIFA
welcomes the change in criteria as it brings Guernsey
in line with other offshore jurisdictions. The change
in definition of a professional investor will encourage
more take up of QIFs and can only be seen a positive
move for the island’s fund industry."
Under the new rules, the definition of Professional
Investor has been widened to include an individual investor
who invests a minimum of USD100,000 in such a fund.
The
revised guidance note issued by the FSC also re-emphasised
the due diligence obligations which Guernsey Licensees
undertake when submitting applications for Guernsey
Qualifying Investor Funds.
The
growing use of Guernsey structures as vehicles for hedge
funds has highlighted a number of areas where the existing
investment fund framework can create problems, leading
the Guernsey Financial Services Commission to issue a
consultation document: The regulatory framework
for Hedge Funds in Guernsey in November 2003, setting
out a range of practical issues, and seeking views from
interested parties on those issues and the solutions which
may be available.
The
Guernsey Financial Services Commission also issued guidance
on the disclosure regime for closed-end investment funds.
That guidance re-emphasised the flexible nature of the
Commissions approach. Guernsey domiciled closed-end
funds are subject to Guernsey company law and the Control
of Borrowing regime, and it is clear, from the closed-end
hedge funds already established under those arrangements,
that few structural problems arise.
In
the open-ended sector, the position is more complex. Open-ended
funds are subject to the Protection of Investors (Bailiwick
of Guernsey) Law 1987, as amended, (POI) and
to rules and regulations made under that law. POI provides,
inter alia, that all Guernsey open-ended funds must be
authorised by the Commission - there is no provision for
unauthorised funds and that each fund
must have a designated manager and a designated trustee
or custodian.
In
mid-2004, the GFSC published a document setting out its
main conclusions regarding hedge funds. The findings are
directed at the funds industry for vehicles which are
popular with institutional investors, said Fiona French,
the commission’s assistant director of investment business:
"We always had the power to waive our rules. Now we’re
saying publicly to hedge fund managers that these are
the ones we’re prepared to waive to establish funds here.
We’re technically not changing the rules because some
elements we’ve always waived."
Areas
where the commission will show flexibility include: not
requiring a Guernsey-domiciled and licensed custodian
to fill the role of a suitably qualified prime broker;
no need for complex segregation requirements for prime
brokers holding fund assets; waivers for funds which can
demonstrate a need to use estimates of net asset value
in advance of final NAV determination; and where estimation
is permitted, there may be waivers of client money rules
requiring segregation of subscription and redemption monies.
In
May, 2006, the report of a Committee appointed in 2005
to consider investment sector legislation and regulation
and to report to the Guernsey Financial Services Commission
and to the Commerce and Employment Department recommended
the creation of a "registered" fund sector, alongside
the existing "regulated" sector. Unlike regulated funds,
registered funds would not need prior approval from GFSC.
The
report suggests that the same framework should apply to
both open and closed end funds, which should be subject
to a dedicated Funds Law, leaving the existing Protection
of Investors Law to deal with other aspects of investment
business.
It
also recommended that public offers should be made subject
to specific Prospectus legislation, rather than to the
current Control of Borrowing regime, and that provision
of services to certain funds domiciled outside Guernsey
should also be liberalised.
The
report additionally recommended that definitions of investment
business in the POI Law be reviewed, that economic benefit
should be abandoned as a criterion for licensing investment
firms, and that some of the sets of rules made under the
POI Law should be merged.
The
report further reflects on the importance of expanding
Guernsey's intellectual capital by attracting new service
providers in areas other than fund administration, and
notes the significance of personal tax rules and housing
policy in achieving those objectives.
Peter
Neville, Director General of the Guernsey Financial Services
Commission, announced following publication of the report
that:
"We
very much welcome the proposals put forward in the Harwood
Committee report. Streamlining authorisation and licensing
processes will benefit: the investment sector by allowing
faster responses; the Commission by letting its dedicated
staff extend their monitoring of licensees rather than
on pre-vetting funds; and Guernsey in general by ensuring
that the service delivered by Guernsey investment firms
continues to support and enhance our established reputation."
"Recent
trends have seen new businesses - stockbrokers, asset
managers and private wealth managers - outside the pure
funds sector establish themselves here in Guernsey. We
also endorse the report's recognition of the importance
of expanding the widest range of investment activity in
Guernsey."
"Once
we have seen how the investment sector responds to the
consultation, we look forward to working with them, with
the Finance Sector Group and the Department of Commerce
and Employment to bring about agreed change as soon as
possible."
In
May 2008 the Guernsey Financial Services Commission commenced
a public consultation on a proposal to fast track the
application process for specified licensees associated
with Qualifying Investor Funds or Registered Closed-ended
Investment Funds.
The
main thrust of the proposal is that a Licence Assessment
Committee will be convened to consider the issue of a
licence under the Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of
Guernsey) Law, 1987 (the POI Law) within 10 business days
of receipt of a complete formal application, together
with confirmations from an appropriately licensed Guernsey
service provider to the Commission that:
-
They have performed sufficient due diligence to be satisfied
that the beneficial owners or controllers of, and relevant
parties to, the applicant for a licence are fit and
proper and meet the requirements as set out in the POI
Law and that in this respect consideration has been
given to all of the issues set out in the Guidance Document
issued by the Commission;
-
They have undertaken sufficient due diligence to confirm
that the application for a licence under the POI Law
which includes the relevant application form and supporting
documentation and information, is complete and accurate.
The
introduction of the Qualifying Investor Fund regime in
February 2005 and the Registered Closed-ended Investment
Fund regime in February 2007 provided fund promoters and
their Guernsey regulated service providers with two fast
track application processes for defined investment funds,
giving a guaranteed response time from the Commission.
Since
the introduction of the two regimes, a significant number
of fund applications have been made under them, and at
the same time associated licence applications under the
the POI Law have been made for parties seeking to provide
management services to the funds.
Due
to the statutory obligations imposed on the Commission
when considering applications for licences under the POI
Law, which do not apply in the same way to fund applications,
the Commission said that it is not possible to guarantee
considering applications for licences in the same time
scale that apply to the two fast track fund application
processes.
The
Commission has acknowledged that this apparent “mis-match”
in timescales is not ideal and proposes to introduce a
regime which will reduce the timescale for the consideration
of licence applications in specified cases.
Due
to the statutory obligations referred to above it is not
possible to reduce the relevant timescale to that applying
to the associated fund applications, but it is considered
that the proposed regime will introduce certainty of response
in respect of licence applications made to the Commission.
The
Commission proposes to introduce a framework applicable
to licence applications under the POI Law for parties
seeking to provide management services to Qualifying Investor
Funds or Registered Closed-ended Investment Funds.
Parties
seeking to conduct activities such as administration or
custody for such funds or who intend to conduct restricted
activities in connection with other types of investment
fund business and/or non-fund business will need to apply
and be assessed under the Commission’s standard
licence application process.
In
April 2009, it was announced that the Guernsey Financial
Services Commission, in conjunction with a Working Party
representative of practitioners across the investment
industry, has been preparing new Conduct of Business Rules
mandatory for all entities licensed under the Protection
of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 1987 as amended.
The
Conduct of Business Rules are the first, and major, part
of a process to replace the Licensees (Financial Resources,
Notification, Conduct of Business and Compliance) Rules,
1998 and the Collective Investment Schemes (Designated
Persons) Rules, 1988. The second and final part of the
process is a revision to the Capital Adequacy Rules, which
went into effect in April 2010 (see Banking above).
The
Conduct of Business Rules recognise the very different
activities undertaken by the population of licensees under
the Law. The main highlights of the Conduct of Business
Rules include:
-
a
comprehensive set of rules outlining the Board of a
licensee’s responsibility for the compliance function;
-
a recognition that the term 'designated manager' applies
to administrators of open-ended and closed-ended collective
investment schemes;
-
the proposed rules do not impose MiFID-style provisions
on licensees; nevertheless, the Rules recognise that
group requirements will apply to some firms and do not,
therefore, conflict with MiFID provisions;
-
the client money rules have been made more rigorous.
In
October 2009, Guernsey’s Chief Minister, Lyndon
Trott, expressed confidence that discussions between the
jurisdiction and key players in Europe will secure the
future for the funds industry in Guernsey.
Trott
said that he was fully aware and had been for some time
of the serious threats posed by the EU Alternative Investment
Fund Managers Directive, which seeks to regulate all alternative
investment funds including private equity and closed-ended
listed funds, where the island is a world leader.
Guernsey’s
political and industry response, being led by the Commerce
and Employment Department with the Guernsey Financial
Services Commission and the Guernsey Investment Funds
Association, has involved a series of meetings in Brussels.
Deputy
Trott said:
“This
development demonstrates just how vital it is that Guernsey
continues to build relationships with Brussels.”
“Brussels
is increasingly influential in setting global regulatory
standards and our continued prosperity will increasingly
depend on our relationship with them.”
The
States team has held discussions with the European Fund
and Asset Management Association, a number of financial
institutions in Europe, and other key individuals involved
in this debate.
Commerce
and Employment Minister Carla McNulty Bauer said that
the purpose of discussions in Brussels were four-fold:
-
To
ensure that there is a clear understanding among decision-makers
of Guernsey’s current regulatory regime;
-
To obtain information on how the directive is likely
to be amended and when it is likely to be finalized;
-
To offer suggestions on how the directive could be amended
to ensure that it meets the objective of better regulation
but also ensures that European professional investors
can continue to access global capital markets; and
-
To develop appropriate contacts within the various European
institutions to build relationships and understanding
about Guernsey.
Deputy
McNulty Bauer said: “There is no doubt that this
directive has the potential to have a significant impact
on the global alternative funds industry. Guernsey is
not immune from those effects.”
“But
the directive also presents a significant opportunity
for us. Our standards of regulation of alternative funds
are high and stronger than that of many EU Member States.
My Department is confident that Guernsey is well placed
to achieve equivalence under the directive at some time
in the future, though that will depend on how the directive
changes during the coming months.”
The
directive is unlikely to be finalized until the summer
of 2010 and will then not come into force until 2014 or
2015. Until that time the status quo remains and Guernsey’s
fund industry can continue to enjoy its current market
access for the next five years.
Guernsey
Finance, the promotional agency for the Island’s
finance industry, has assured that, despite the European
Union’s continued steps towards introducing the
controversial Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive,
the future of Guernsey as a leading funds domicile is
not in jeopardy.
Peter
Niven, Chief Executive of Guernsey Finance, said:
“I
am confident that no matter which approach is finally
adopted by the European Union, Guernsey is well positioned
to remain an attractive and competitive jurisdiction for
European professional investors.”
“Under
the latest proposals any third country hedge fund or private
equity group will be able to gain an EU passport if it
complies with the new rules and its home country applies
global standards. We certainly believe that Guernsey meets
all the relevant criteria, not least through our long-standing
commitment to adopt international standards on regulation,
transparency and information exchange. This has been recognized
by the Island’s inclusion on the OECD ‘white
list’ and the findings of the Foot Review.”
Niven
added: “Guernsey’s government, industry and
regulator will be continuing the joint work to understand
the implications of the Directive, lobby for changes to
the proposals, and promote a better understanding of our
regulatory regime and alternative funds industry to ensure
we have the best possible outcome for the island.”
In
May 2010, European Union finance ministers reached an
agreement on a mandate for the Spanish Presidency of the
EU to negotiate with the European Parliament on a directive
establishing an EU framework for managers of alternative
investment funds. A final vote on the draft directive
by the European Parliament has been scheduled for July,
2010.
BACK
TO TOP
|
|
|
 |
| THE LOWTAX LIBRARY
One of the web's largest and
most authoritative business and investment information sources. Alongside
topical, daily news on worldwide
tax developments, you can receive weekly newswires or
access up-to-date intelligence
reports on a range of legal, tax and investment subjects.
FREE TRIAL NEWS SUBSCRIPTION
Our 16 constantly updated
intelligence reports cover every important aspect of 'offshore' and international
tax-planning in depth, including banking secrecy, the EU's savings tax
directive, offshore funds, e-commerce, offshore gaming and transfer pricing.
Reports are available for immediate downloading or as subscription
services with news pages.
|
|
 |
|