Gibraltar Structure and Regulation of the Legal Profession
Gibraltar has a fused legal profession so that barristers
and solicitors enjoy the same rights and privileges
as regards appearances in court and direct contact with
clients. The profession is regulated under the Supreme
Court Ordinance (the 'Ordinance'). The Chief Justice
may approve admit and enrol as barristers any persons
who have been admitted as barristers in England or Northern
Ireland or the Republic of Ireland or as advocates in
the Court of Session in Scotland.
Likewise in the case of solicitors any persons who have
been admitted as solicitors of the Supreme Court of
Judicature in England or any Court of Record in Northern
Ireland or the Republic of Ireland or a solicitor in
administrative practice in Scotland may also act as
barristers.
The Bar Council regulates the profession and is closely
associated with its English counterpart.
In August, 2004, the government announced that it had
partially transposed into local law a European Union
Directive, 2001/19, on mutual recognition of professional
qualifications. This was achieved through the Recognition
of Professional Qualifications Ordinance (amendment)
Ordinance 2003 passed in the House of Assembly on 28
July 2003.
Back to top
The Ordinance provides that the rules prescribed from
time to time by the Bar Council and the Law Society
in England in regard to the professional conduct of
barristers and solicitors apply in Gibraltar, unless
modified by the Chief Justice.
In practice the English barristers' or solicitors'
rules apply depending whether a Gibraltarian lawyer
is deemed to be acting in a barrister's or solicitor's
role.
The Ordinance gives the Chief Justice extensive powers
to suspend, reprimand, fine, investigate or strike off
barristers or solicitors.
The Barrister and Solicitors Rules provide for the
establishment of an Admissions and Disciplinary Committee.
Rule 7 provides that:
- Any complaint of the conduct of a barrister or
solicitor in his professional capacity shall be in
writing and shall be addressed to the Registrar
- The Registrar shall lay the complaint before the
committee; and
- Furnish the barrister or solicitor concerned with
a copy of such complaint.
Back to top
Gibraltar Solicitors' Accounts Rules
Rules 3-4 stipulate that client money (including trust
money) must be kept in a separate and designated client
account. Rule 7 specifies the circumstances in which
money may be withdrawn from a client account and includes
payments to and on behalf of a client, payment towards
a solicitor's costs and money drawn on the client's
authority.
Back to top
Gibraltar Professional Indemnity Insurance
Although most firms have indemnity insurance, this
is not mandatory. In particular a client should check
that individual lawyers are insured. At the time of
writing a new proposal was being envisaged by the Bar
Council making individual indemnity insurance compulsory.
Back to top
Gibraltar Fees and Disputes
There are no hard and fast rules with regard to billing.
In general a lawyer's bill of costs should contain sufficient
information to identify the matter and the period to
which it relates together with disbursements. Contingency
fees are not allowed. Normally, individual law firms
agree fees based on an hourly rate.
Where there is a dispute as to the fees charged, a
client may pursue two mutually exclusive possibilities
(see also above):
- request the lawyer to submit a bill of costs to
the Registrar of the Supreme Court for taxation;
- or submit a complaint to the Bar Council who will
in an appropriate situation request the lawyer to
review the matter.
Back to top
Gibraltar Recent Trends
Company incorporations and associated work had been
a staple source of legal work. The downturn in the Spanish
property market and the introduction of the Special
Annual Tax by Spain, has meant a significant drop in
incorporations.
In December 2006, Gibraltarians accepted a new constitution
for the jurisdiction, which aimed to give it more autonomy
from the United Kingdom over its own internal affairs.
The constitution, agreed in April 2006 by then UK Foreign
Secretary Jack Straw and Peter Caruana, and between
Gibraltar's two main political parties later in the
year, saw the UK retaining international responsibility
for Gibraltar.
However, the new constitution ceded certain powers
previously in the possession of the British government
to Gibraltar, and allowed the jurisdiction to have its
own independent judiciary.
Back to top
Gibraltar Table of Statutes
This is a non-exhaustive list of the main Gibraltar
statutes affecting offshore and non-resident business.
The statutes are listed in alphabetical order –
click on the statute for a fuller description of the
statute, the legal regime it forms part of, or in some
cases the text of the law.
Banking (Accounts Directive) Regulations
1997
Banking (Auditors and Information) Ordinance 1997
Banking Ordinance 1992
Bankruptcy Ordinance
Companies Ordinance as amended
Companies (Taxation and Concessions) Ordinance
Deposit Guarantee Scheme Ordinance
1997
Development Aid Ordinance
Estate Duties Ordinance
Financial Institutions (Prudential Supervision) Ordinance
1997
Financial Services (Accounting and Financial) Regulations
Financial Services (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations
1991
Financial Services (Conduct of Business) Regulations
1991
Financial Services (Experienced Investor
Funds) Regulations, 2005
Financial Services (Insurance Mediation)
(Amendment) Ordinance 2004
Financial Services Ordinance 1998
Immigration Control Ordinance
Income Tax Ordinance 1984 as amended
Income Tax (Allowances, Deductions and Exemptions) Rules
1992
Income Tax (Qualifying Companies) Rules 1992
Insurance Companies Ordinance 1987
Limited Partnership Ordinance as amended
Partnership Act
1890 (UK)
Perpetuities and Accumulations Ordinance 1986
Private Foundation
Ordinance 1999
Qualifying (High Net-Worth Individuals) Rules 1992
The Registered Trust Ordinance 1999
Trust Recognition Ordinance
EU Directives having direct effect in Gibraltar:
Directive 78/660/EEC
(The Fourth Directive) as amended
Directive 83/349/EEC (The Seventh Directive) as amended
Directive 83/350/EEC (sharing of confidential banking
information)
Second Banking Co-ordination Directive 89/646/EC (passporting)
In addition, the Financial Services Commission Act
2007 (FSCA) repealed and replaced the Financial Services
Commission Act of 1989. The 2007 legislation, in addition
to other changes, placed some of the powers previously
held by the UK in the hands of the local authorities
The Financial Services Commission website provides
comprehensive access to legislation affecting the banking,
funds,
investment
services, and insurance
sectors.
In January, 2005, Gibraltar’s Financial Services Commission
welcomed the publication of a statutory review of Gibraltar's
Financial Services Commission, conducted by an HM Treasury
review team.
This was the third review commissioned under the Financial
Services Commission Ordinance 1989, and was requested
by the FSC in view of the rapidly changing regulatory
environment in the United Kingdom, as the Commission
is obliged by the founding Ordinance to match UK standards
of supervision.
According to the FSC, four key areas of its work were
considered by the review team, these being: anti-money
laundering, banking, insurance and investment services.
The report concluded that the Commission’s supervisory
activities, for both insurance and investment services,
established and implemented standards that substantially
matched UK legislation and practice. Recommendations
were made by the review team as to how the FSC could
readily make the remaining adjustments necessary to
bring it fully into line with recently introduced UK
regulatory developments.
The team was also satisfied that the Commission’s approach
to banking supervision had succeeded in developing an
effective supervisory structure that established standards
which met its obligations under the Financial Services
Commission Ordinance to match those required by UK legislation
and supervisory practice.
Gibraltar’s anti-money laundering regime was judged
more robust than that of the UK in a number of areas,
“even taking into account the different risks posed
by the business”.
In November 2006, the Gibraltar Financial Services
Commission announced a comprehensive review of the jurisdiction's
anti-money laundering measures.
The review saw the GFSC redraft the anti-money laundering
guidance notes for the finance industry from top to
bottom, with the proposed changes intended to clarify
the existing laws while reducing paperwork and bureaucracy,
and also encouraging finance industry participants to
take a more active role in combating financial crime
and terrorist financing.
Importantly, the revised rules aimed to bring Gibraltar
into compliance with the third money laundering directive
2007 and the latest Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
recommendations.
The finance industry was asked to contribute to the
review process by the regulator, as part of a consultation
lasting until January 1, 2007.
Commenting on the review, Marcus Killick, Gibraltar’s
Financial Services Commissioner, told the Gibraltar
Chronicle that there was a need to move away from a
“tick and bash” approach to anti-money laundering
towards a more proactive strategy that anticipates new
trends, as criminals use ever more sophisticated methods
and complex transactions to cover their tracks.
“It’s like a game of chess. We have to
think ahead and anticipate what they are going to be
doing in two moves' time," he told the paper.
In May 2007, following a review undertaken the previous
year, the International Monetary Fund endorsed Gibraltar’s
robust regulatory environment, according to the jurisdiction's
government.
he report was the result of the visit by a team of
nine evaluators from the IMF to Gibraltar in March 2006.
The team conducted an extensive review of the Financial
Services Commission’s regulatory and supervisory
practices in the fields of Banking and Insurance, as
well as a jurisdiction-wide review of the Anti-Money
Laundering and Terrorist Financing Regime, which also
included the FSC, as well a large number of enforcement
agencies and Government Departments.
In all three areas Gibraltar was found to be meeting
international standards, and was found to be ahead of
many onshore - and much larger - finance centres.
However, the report made a number of recommendations
for further improvements, which the government said
had mostly been identified and were being actioned.
Commenting, Chief Minister Peter Caruana, who is responsible
for financial services stated that: “Government
is committed to continuing to pursue a policy of proper
balance between demanding the highest regulatory standards
from the providers of financial services and providing
an attractive jurisdiction for the conduct of profitable,
safe and competitive financial services."
"In this connection the Government welcomes external
assessments such as the IMF Review to maintain an independent
view of Gibraltar’s performance and to identify
what we need to do to stay at the front of the pack
as a leading jurisdiction in this ever changing industry.
I congratulate all those in the Finance Centre Department,
in the Financial Services Commission and in law enforcement
agencies, for this excellent result from which our finance
centre will benefit still further.”
Back to top
Gibraltar Banking Law
Financial services in Gibraltar are regulated by the
Financial Services Commission. The Commission introduced
important changes to the way it supervises locally incorporated
banks and non-EEA branches in 2002.
Within this time the FSC had been rolling out a risk
based approach to supervision, where the supervisory
team evaluates an institution in terms of the risks
posed to an institution in the way it does business
or the type of business it is in. This new approach
to supervision aims to focus supervisory resources on
the areas deemed to be high risk for an institution
in order to ensure that the right controls and procedures
are in place to mitigate the risks or where corrective
action is required by an institution.
Banking regulation is exercised under the Banking
Ordinance 1992 (as updated).
Banks with licenses issued by other EU jurisdictions
have only to notify the Gibraltar authorities before
commencing business there; banks which require Gibraltarian
authorisation and licenses must conform to criteria
set out below.
Licensed banks must maintain a solvency ratio of 10%.
There is an annual fee payable to the Financial Services
Commission.
Banks providing local services are taxable on their
profits in the same way as ordinary companies.
Licensing and Supervision
The Banking Ordinance 1992 (as amended) repealed the
previous distinction between 'A' onshore and 'B' offshore
licences, and introduced a single banking licence. Thus
Gibraltar licensed banks can in theory take advantage
of 'passporting' opportunities and branch out across
the EU and EEA without the need for further authorisation
(except for notification).
The minimum capital required for the issue of a banking
license in Gibraltar is (at the time of writing) EUR5m,
in line with EU requirements, and the supervisory regime
follows EU and Basle Committee guidelines. In considering
the issue of a banking license, the Commissioner applies
a number of guidelines, including the following:
-
Directors, controllers and managers to be fit
and proper persons: the Commissioner takes into
account probity, experience, skills, judgement and
likely degree of diligence; good reputation and
the absence of a criminal record are also important;
and the nature of a person's other business interests
is also considered;
-
'Four eyes principle': the Commissioner will
want to be assured that at least two individuals
contribute on a continuing basis to the formation
and execution of policy, so that every signifcant
decision reuslts from the exercise of at least two
persons' judgement;
-
Business to be conducted in a prudent manner:
applicants for a license are required to provide
sufficient information about the proposed business
and its conduct and development, including the availability
of capital to support planned levels of lending
or investment, for the Commissioner to be able to
form a view of the stability of the institution;
it is normally unlikely that a new banking formation
will be able to achieve the right level of credibility
unless it has the support of an existing and soundly-based
bank;
-
Paid-up capital and reserves will be adequate
to protect the interests of depositors; large exposures
to a single entity are a major negative factor;
-
Liquidity must be maintained at a satisfactory
level in relation to the schedule of liabilities;
-
Adequate provision is and will be made for bad
and doubtful debts and for contingent liabilities;
-
There will be adequate accounting and other
records and control systems to ensure stability
and predictability in the business;
-
The necessity that the institution itself will
behave with the highest professional, ethical and
business standards;
-
The Head Office needs to be in Gibraltar - meaning
that the majority of board meetings will take place
there, and that the management and direction should
be exercised there; regular influence on managerial
decisions by a dominant shareholder would be a negative
factor, especially if the shareholder was not resident
in Gibraltar.
In 2004 the Financial Services Commission promoted
amendments to the Criminal Justice Ordinance 1995 which
require auditors, external accountants, tax advisors,
real estate agents, notaries, legal professionals, dealers
in high value goods and casinos as well as providers
of company managerial services, professional trustees,
insurance intermediaries and insurance managers to comply
with the anti-money laundering systems of control. The
FSC seeks to update the Know Your Customer systems of
financial institutions with a more risk based approach
and to provide more user-friendly guidance for the industry.
Confidentiality
Within the general statutory duty of confidentaility,
authorised institutions, and their controllers and subsidiaries,
and institutions of which authorised institutions are
controllers, are permitted to exchange between each
other information about their customers necessary to
facilitate supervision of institutions on a consolidated
basis in accordance with Council Directive 83/350/EEC
(as extended, where applicable, by the EEA agreement)
or any successor thereto.
In December 2005, it emerged that an agreement had
been reached between the governments of Gibraltar and
the United Kingdom over the Rock's obligations under
the EU Savings Tax Directive, which came into force
in July of that year.
The jurisdiction had come under fire from the Channel
Islands, as its legal status in relation to the UK and
European Union meant that the Directive did not apply
to it in quite the same way.
However, under the deal announced by the UK's Paymaster
General, Dawn Primarolo and Gibraltar's Chief Minister,
Peter Caruana , Gibraltar and the UK exchange information
about the returns on savings under the Directive, or,
in Gibraltar's case only, if the savers so choose, impose
a withholding tax on returns on savings of UK residents
with accounts there.
The rate was set at 15% from April 1, 2006 to June
30, 2008, following which it rose to 20% for the next
three years, and 35% thereafter.
Statutory Codes of Conduct
The Financial Services (Conduct of Business) Regulations
1991 contain a statutory Code of Conduct for Financial
Institutions. Part Two (Statements of Principle) is
laid out under a number of headings, including the following:
Integrity - Skill, care and diligence - Best market
practice - Know your customer - Information for customers
- Conflicts of interest - Customer assets - Financial
resources - Internal organisation - Relations with the
Commission
Part 3 (Core Rules) deals with:
Independence - Advertising and Marketing - Customer
Relations - Dealing for Customers - Market Integrity
- Administration.
Gibraltar has introduced a deposit guarantee scheme
to satisfy the requirements of the EC Directive on Deposit
Guarantee Schemes (94/19/EC). The Deposit Guarantee
Ordinance 1997 was implemented in stages and a Gibraltar
Deposit Guarantee Board has been appointed.
The compensation arrangements, are broadly similar
to those available to depositors under the United Kingdom's
deposit protection arrangements. The scheme covers qualifying
deposits in EEA currencies (qualifying deposits are
defined in the Ordinance).
Back to top
Gibraltar Insurance Law
Gibraltar insurance companies, including captives,
are regulated by the Financial Services Commission under
the Insurance Companies Ordinance 1987 (as updated)
and the Financial Services Ordinance.
The 2nd and 3rd EU Insurance Directives have been
implemented in Gibraltar, and the UK Government has
agreed that Gibraltar's insurance regulatory regime
matches UK practice; therefore the Single European Passport
applies - EU insurers may write direct business into
Gibraltar, and Gibraltar insurance companies can write
direct business into other EU states.
Insurance companies in Gibraltar, including branches
or subsidiaries of foreign insurers, require a license
from the Commissioner of Insurance. The Commissioner
will take into account the expertise, skill and experience
of the proposed management team, the ability of an applicant
to conform with prescribed EU guidelines including solvency
margins and guarantee fund levels, and the availability
of adequate reinsurance.
Initial application and annual fees are payable to
the Commissioner. Licensed insurance companies are required
to conform to the following ongoing supervisory regime:
- A place of business must be maintained in Gibraltar
at all times;
- Insurance and accounting records must be maintained
in Gibraltar;
- Financial statement must be submitted to the Commissioner
within six months of the end of the insurer's financial
year;
- Solvency margins and minimum guarantee funds must
be maintained at all times; and
- Approval must be sought for all changes of director,
manager or controller.
There are a number of sets of regulations dealing
with the detailed conduct of insurance business in Gibraltar,
some of them implementing EU legislation. The seven
main sets are as follows:
- The Insurance Companies (Valuation of Assets and
Liabilities) Regulations 1996;
- The Insurance Companies (Accounts and Statements)
Regulations 1996;
- The Insurance Companies (Prescribed Particulars)
Regulations 1996;
- The Insurance Companies (Accounts Directive) Regulations
1997;
- The Insurance Companies (Solvency Margins and Guarantee
Funds) Regulations 1996;
- The Insurance Companies (Conduct of Business) Regulations
1996;
- The Insurance Companies (Prudential Supervision)
Regulations 1997.
Insurance companies providing local services are taxable
on their profits in the same way as ordinary companies
(see Domestic Corporate
Taxation); insurers working 'offshore' could
traditionally apply for a tax exemption certificate
(no tax payable at all) or a 'qualifying' certificate
(see Offshore Legal and
Tax Regimes) allowing them to pay tax at a rate
between nil and 35% as agreed with the authorities.
Protected Cell Company Legislation
The Gibraltar parliament, the House of Assembly, passed
a bill for a Protected Cell Companies Ordinance on 3
July 2001.
The legislation, which was expected to boost sectors
such as captive insurance and funds, in essence provides
for a single company with individual parts, known as
cells, which are kept separate from each other. Each
cell is only liable for its own debts and not for the
debts of any other cell within the company.
Part I - Part I of the Ordinance describes
the formation and attributes of a protected cell company.
A company may be either incorporated as a PCC, or converted,
if so authorised by its articles, into a PCC. The new
law stipulates that, for the avoidance of doubt, “a
protected cell company is a single legal person,” and
that “the creation by a PCC of a cell does not create,
in respect of that cell, a legal person separate from
the company”. The provisions of the Companies Ordinance
apply in relation to a protected cell company (subject
to the provisions of the PCC Ordinance, and unless the
context requires otherwise).
Separation Of Assets - Particularly noteworthy
is Section 5 of Part I, which describes the duty to
keep the assets of each cell separately identifiable.
“It shall be the duty of the directors of a protected
cell company – (a) to keep cellular assets separate
and separately identifiable from non-cellular assets;
and (b) to keep cellular assets attributable to each
cell separate and separately identifiable from cellular
assets attributable to other cells.” Directors may “cause
or permit” cellular and non-cellular assets to be held
by or through a nominee, or by a company whose shares
and capital interests may be cellular assets, non-cellular
assets, or a combination of both. Such assets may be
collectively invested, or collectively managed by an
investment manager, provided that the assets in question
remain separately identifiable. Sections 6 and 7 make
it clear that the rights of creditors are limited to
the assets of the cell of which they are creditors.
Cell Shares, Cellular Capital And Cellular Dividends
- Section 8 provides for a PCC to create and issue shares
(“cell shares”) in respect of any of its cells. The
proceeds of the issue (“cell share capital”) are comprised
in the cellular assets attributable to the cell in respect
of which the cell shares are issued. A protected cell
company may pay a cellular dividend. Section 9 provides
that except in the case of a PCC which is authorised
by the Financial Services Commissioner as a collective
investment scheme, and which is redeeming units or shares
in accordance with its scheme particulars, no reduction
of cell share capital may be made without an order of
the Court. Section 10 provides that a protected cell
company must state that it is one i.e. the name of the
PCC must include “Protected Cell”, “PCC”, or any cognate
expression approved in writing by the Registrar. The
memorandum of a PCC shall state that it is such, and
each cell shall have its own distinct name or designation.
Insurance Companies, Collective Investment Schemes
And Securitisation - Section 11 states that a company
which is a Gibraltar insurer as defined in Section 2
of the Insurance Companies Ordinance, or a collective
investment scheme authorised under the Financial Services
Ordinance 1989 must obtain the consent of the Financial
Services Commissioner before becoming a PCC. In the
case of securitisation companies not requiring a licence
under the Financial Services Ordinances 1989 or 1998
established principally for the purposes of issuing
bonds, notes or other debt securities or instruments,
secured or unsecured, in respect of which the repayment
of capital and interest is to be funded from the company’s
investments, consent must be sought from the Finance
Centre Director. Sections 13 to 18 deal with the liability
of cellular and non-cellular assets of the company.
“The cellular assets attributable to a particular cell
shall be primarily used to satisfy a liability, and
the non-cellular assets shall be secondarily used, provided
that the cellular assets have been exhausted. However,
any liability not attributable to a particular cell
of a PCC shall be the liability solely of the company’s
non-cellular assets.”
Parts II and III deal with the effects of receivership
and administration orders on each individual cell and
on the company as a whole. Part IV covers offences under
the Ordinance.
The passporting of insurance and reinsurance mediation
from Gibraltar throughout the EEA came into effect on
January 15, 2005.
Passporting rights arise under the single market directives,
and grant a person in the designated jurisdiction the
right to establish a branch in another EEA state or
to do business there on a cross-border basis, subject
to the fulfillment of the conditions in the directive
in question.
This was the fourth passporting badge awarded to Gibraltar,
following insurance in 1997, banking in 1999, and investment
services in 2003.
According to the Rock's financial
services authorities, the passporting of insurance and
reinsurance mediation was enabled by the passing of
an amending ordinance, the Financial Services (Insurance
Mediation) (Amendment) Ordinance 2004 in the House of
Assembly on December 22, 2004. The Ordinance amended
the Financial Services Ordinance 1989 in order to transpose
into the law of Gibraltar Directive 2002/92/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of December 9,
2002 on insurance mediation.
The Ordinance provides for the regulation of insurance
and reinsurance mediation, including such activities
as:
- Introducing, proposing or carrying out other work
preparatory to the conclusion of contracts of insurance
or reinsurance;
- Concluding contracts of insurance or reinsurance;
and
- Assisting in the administration and performance
of such contracts, in particular in the event of a
claim.
Back to top
Investment Fund Management Law
The Financial Services Commission is responsible for
the regulation of investment funds in Gibraltar under
the Financial Services Ordinance (as updated); the Financial
Services (Collective Investment Schemes) Regulations
1991 set up regulatory regimes for different types of
fund, and implemented the EU UCITS Directive (85/611/EU).
Investment funds in Gibraltar are usually formed under
a trust deed either as unit trusts or mutual funds,
or under the Companies Ordinance as private or public
companies. A public investment company (PIC) must have
a minimum paid-up capital of GIP50,000 (at the time
of writing) and if it is not listed on a recognised
exchange its head office must be in Gibraltar.
Funds formed to be UCITS (Undertakings for Collective
Investment in Transferable Securities) which under EU
rules can be freely marketed throughout the Union under
the Single European Passport provisions, must be open-ended
and are limited to certain types of transferable security:
- those listed on a stock exchange in the European
Union;
- those traded on another regulated market in the
European Union;
- those listed on an approved stock exchange or traded
on an approved, regulated market outside the European
Union;
- recently-issued securities; and
- approved, publicly-traded debt instruments.
The authorities do not demand that the administration
of a fund must be carried out in Gibraltar, as long
as there is a sufficient strength of management in Gibraltar
to allow for effective supervision. There is a requirement
however that the trustee of a fund and the manager should
be in separate organisations and should act independently,
even if they have a common parent.
Application and annual license fees are payable. Fund
managers have traditionally been able to apply for a
tax-exemption certificate (no tax payable) or for a
qualifying certificate (tax payable at a rate between
nil and 35% as agreed with the authorities (however,
for changes to this, see Offshore
Tax Regimes).
In 2005 Gibraltar introduced Experienced
Investor Funds (EIFs) under the Financial Services (Experienced
Investor Funds) Regulations, 2005. See a full
description of this and other fund regimes provided
by Gibraltar law firm Hassans.
In April 2005 it emerged following the 30th Annual
Conference of the International Organisation of Securities
Commissions (IOSCO) that the Gibraltar Financial Services
Commission’s application to be accepted as an Ordinary
Member of the Organisation had been approved.
IOSCO members regulate more than 90% of the world's
securities markets, and IOSCO is seen as the world's
most important international cooperative forum for securities
regulatory agencies.
In December 2005, the Gibraltar Government and the
UK Government concluded an agreement relating to the
passporting of Investment Services.
The agreement enables investment services firms established
in Gibraltar to passport (that is to market and sell)
their products and services into the UK market. The
investment services passporting agreement came into
effect in May 2006 when Gibraltar had passed some necessary
legislation.
Back to top
Gibraltar Trust Law
The basic law of trusts is contained in the Gibraltar
Trustee Ordinance, which is virtually a copy of English
trust legislation. Gibraltarian legislation affecting
trusts also includes the Perpetuities and Accumulations
Ordinance 1986, the Trustee Investments Ordinance, the
Bankruptcy Ordinance and the Trusts (Recognition) Ordinance
which implemented the Hague Convention. Appeal is to
the Privy Council.
There are no provisions for the exclusion of foreign
inheritance laws or for the non-recognition of foreign
judgements. Legislation has not yet been introduced
to provide for purpose trusts.
As in the UK, the essential requirements of a trust
in Gibraltar are that it is created orally or in writing
and that a settlor conveys legal title to real property
(land) or personal property (property other than land)
into the name of one or more trustees to be administered
in accordance with the wishes of the settlor for the
benefit of one or more beneficiaries.
Trust documents are in English, and there are no requirements
for registration except that Asset Protection Trusts
must be registered with the Registrar of Dispositions.
There is no stamp duty. The normal perpetuity period
of a Gibraltar trust is 100 years. There are no restrictions
on the accumulation of income during the perpetuity
period.
Gibraltar's asset protection trust legislation falls
under the provisions of the Bankruptcy Amendment Ordinance
1992. This is unusual for offshore asset protection
, which is dealt with under the law on fraudulent conveyancing
laws in most offshore jurisdictions, as for instance
in the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas.
Fraudulent conveyancing laws depend for their effect
on the statutory definition of 'intent' to defraud.
By contrast, under bankruptcy law, which contains no
definition of intent, the only direct action which can
be commenced is a bankruptcy proceeding, which has a
significantly tighter test of intent.
For a bankruptcy proceeding to succeed, it is necessary
to show that the target (the settlor) is resident or
domiciled in the jurisdiction, and that an 'act of bankruptcy'
was committed there. Since most asset protection trusts
are settled via exempt companies, whose owner (= the
settlor) cannot be resident and a beneficiary, this
will be difficult or impossible in many cases.
Back to top