Auditors,
who are individuals, are appointed
by the directors of a company, must
be independent of the company, and
must be registered under the Auditors
Registration Ordinance.
The
European Commission announced in
2001 that it would begin a review
of Gibraltar's exempt and qualifying
company regimes, but after Gibraltar
sued the Commission to prevent the
review, the European Court of Justice
ruled in Gibraltar's favour in April
2002.
However,
in July, 2002, Gibraltar's
Chief Minister, Peter Caruana announced
the territory's new corporate taxation
policy (which was to have been applied
from July 2003, but fell by the
wayside), which included the abolition
of the
existing corporate forms which allowed
zero taxation, the Exempt and Qualifying
companies.
In
March, 2003, the EU's Council of
Finance Ministers confirmed that
the reforms did not constitute harmful
tax measures. However,
in April, 2004, the Commission argued
that the new rules would give companies
domiciled in Gibraltar an unfair
advantage over their counterparts
in the UK, under a principle known
as 'regional selectivity'. The Commission
also took issue with the fact that
since the taxes were to be based
on payroll and the occupation of
business premises, offshore companies
registered in Gibraltar would be
unlikely to incur any tax liability.
The EC therefore rejected the reforms,
effectively suggesting that for
taxation purposes, Gibraltar should
be considered part of the United
Kingdom.
Chief
Minister, Peter Caruana slammed
the EC for suggesting that the jurisdiction
was fiscally part of the United
Kingdom, pointing to its 1969 constitution,
which gives the territory fiscal
autonomy.
Gibraltar
dissolved its qualifying companies
tax regime in January, 2005, as
negotiations continued in Brussels.
In a move that cost the Gibraltar
government an estimated £1.5 million
in annual tax revenues, the remaining
qualifying companies, of which there
were about 80, switched to the ‘exempt’
companies regime. “Each qualifying
company has been dealt with on an
individual basis and alternative
arrangements made,” said the government.
Later
in the month, it was announced that
Gibraltar had been given until 2010
(2007 for new companies) to phase
out its exempt company tax regime
after the European Commission ruled
that the scheme violated EU state
aid rules.
The
government of Gibraltar welcomed
the European Commission's approval
of the Exempt Company Status Agreement
as an acceptable compromise.
Then
in June 2007, further major changes
to Gibraltar's corporate tax regime
were announced in Peter Caruana's
Budget speech.
Mr
Caruana explained that: "The
Tax Exempt Company has been the
backbone of the development and
growth of both our finance centre
and the online gambling industry,
and thus of a very significant part
of our economy. It continues to
underpin thousands of jobs in Gibraltar
and large amounts of Government
revenue."
"In
order to comply with EU law we must
phase out the tax exempt company
in 2010. However, in order to sustain
our successful economic model we
must retain a commitment to a very
competitive corporate tax model."
"Since
it is no longer legally acceptable
to have one tax model for ‘local’
companies and a different one for
‘foreign’ companies
it is necessary to have a low tax
system for all companies because
without a low tax system for overseas
companies they will leave, and our
economy will suffer hugely. Thousands
of jobs would be lost, as well as
significant Government revenue.
I have therefore already said, and
I reaffirm now, that the Gibraltar
Government is irrevocably committed
to the principle of ‘low tax’
for our economic operators."
"By
mid-2010 the Government will have
introduced an across the board flat,
low corporate tax rate. This will
most probably be set at 10%, but
in any event not higher than 12%.
This will be similar to arrangements
that already exist in Ireland, Cyprus,
Malta and other EU Countries."
"In
the intervening period, the Government
will engage in an intensive, detailed
and lengthy process of consultation
with the different economic sectors."
"In
order to signal the Government’s
seriousness of purpose in this respect
I am today taking the first step
in the process of reducing corporate
tax rates in Gibraltar, by 2% for
the year of assessment 07/08 from
35% to 33%, and with effect from
the year of assessment 2008/09 by
a further 3% from 33% to 30%."
"I
would also signal the intention
of a further reduction the year
after that to 27%, in anticipation
of the introduction of the flat
low tax rate in 2010."
In
his budget in June 2008, Peter Caruana
announced his intention to bring
forward a 3% cut in corporate tax
originally scheduled to take place
in 2009, meaning that the corporate
rate would drop by 6% that year.
"Last
year, and in order to signal the
Government’s seriousness of
purpose in reducing corporate tax
rates, I reduced corporate tax rates
to 33%, and said that I would reduce
it further this year to 30%, with
a signalled reduction to 27% next
year," Caruana told Parliament
in his budget speech.
"In
order to further signal the Government’s
commitment I am advancing that timetable
by one year, and therefore the corporate
tax rate is now reduced by 6% from
33% to 27% with effect from this
year that is the year of assessment
2008/09," he added.
Caruana
explained that he envisaged a further
cut in the rate next year, before
moving to the rate of between 10%
and 12% from 2010, adding that:
"My strong preference will
favour the bottom end of that range."
In
December 2008, the European Court
of First Instance ruled in favour
of Gibraltar, stating that the European
Commission was wrong to argue that
the tax reforms proposed in 2002/03
were in breach of state aid rules,
and effectively giving the jurisdiction
licence to set its own tax rules.
The
Court dismissed the EU Commission’s
case, and stated that although the
UK is representative of Gibraltar,
Gibraltar does, however, have fiscal
autonomy from the UK, and therefore
can introduce its own individual
tax system (the aforementioned 10-12%
corporation tax).
In
a statement to the press at the
time, Peter Caruana, Gibraltar's
Chief Minister, said he was "overjoyed"
by the outcome.
"The
Court has found in Gibraltar’s
favour and has accepted our arguments
on each and every issue, relating
both to regional selectivity and
material selectivity, and has ordered
the commission to pay the Gibraltar
government’s legal costs.”
“This
needs to be clearly understood.
Had Gibraltar lost the Regional
Selectivity case, we would have
had to adopt the UK’s company
tax system and company tax rates.
That would result in the bulk, if
not all, of the finance centre and
gambling companies leaving Gibraltar.
That would have meant the loss of
thousands of jobs throughout our
economy, and a very large fall in
government revenue. This in turn
would have rendered unsustainable
our current level of public services
and public sector employment.”
“This
is a huge and vital victory for
Gibraltar. A threat to our economic,
social, and thus political well-being,
has, once again, been successfully
seen off. I believe that the economy
of Gibraltar now has the opportunity
to forge ahead to the next level
of growth and development, to fulfil
its great potential and thus to
guarantee that we shall bequeath
economic and social prosperity and
stability to our children, grand
children and future generations.
“
”Once
again, this small community has
demonstrated that, when right is
on our side, and we hold our nerve
and we behave reasonably and intelligently,
we have the ability and determination
to defend our rights and interests
as a people, even when they are
challenged by more powerful entities
and forces.”
”On
behalf of the people of Gibraltar,
I wish to thank all those companies
in the financial services and gambling
sectors and other sectors of the
economy that have had the faith
and confidence in us to stay with
Gibraltar during these difficult
and uncertain times.”
“The
threat that Gibraltar has faced
cannot be understated, nor therefore,
can the importance of this victory
to Gibraltar and its people and
our future.”
In
his 2009 budget speech, Caruana
confirmed that a 10% corporate tax
would apply in the jurisdiction
from January 1, 2011, and that the
Exempt Company regime would be rescinded
by the end of 2010.
"It is essential for Gibraltar’s
socio-economic prosperity that our
corporate tax rate should be as
competitive as is compatible with
government’s revenue needs.
Without this there would be large
scale loss of economic activity
and job losses,” he told the
House.
“Existing
corporate taxpayers will be huge
windfall beneficiaries of the need
to eliminate tax exempt status,
and its replacement with a low rate
for all companies. The new rate
will be 10%. Energy and utility
providers will pay a 10% surcharge
and will thus suffer a rate of 20%.
These will include electricity,
fuel, telephone service and water
providers,” he explained.
Caruana
reassured that the government would
allow existing Exempt Status Companies
to keep their tax benefits until
'the last possible minute': "Most
Exempt Status companies currently
hold exemption certificates that
are valid, subject to repeal of
the legislation, for 25 years. The
Government therefore feels honour
bound not to remove the tax benefit
provided by the exemption certificate
until the last possible moment.
That will therefore occur at midnight
on December 31, 2010, by means of
a repeal of the Companies (Taxation
and Concessions) Act.”
The
remainder of this page deals with
the corporate regime prior to the
aforementioned changes.
Gibraltar
Private Company Limited by Shares