The debate was sponsored by Mark Field, the Conservative MP for the Cities of London and Westminster, who argued that small international financial centres (IFCs) have endured unwarranted “political attacks and misguided criticism as major governments seek to understand the cause of the global financial crisis”.

Field said that there remained a risk that initiatives being driven by the OECD, the G-20, the Financial Action Task Force, the EU and national governments run the risk of inaccurately pinpointing small IFCs as scapegoats for the recent shortcomings in financial markets, and in doing so obscuring the real causes of the financial crisis.

“Small IFCs were not the cause of the global financial crisis. While it is convenient to blame far-off countries for causing the financial crisis, even those who work in the financial markets do not accept that small IFCs were a major cause of the crisis,” he said.

In particular, he told the forum he sought to caution against recent attacks on zero-ten tax regimes. He observed a worrying trend which not only undermines those territories’ tax sovereignty but he noted that high tax countries were seeking to introduce their high tax rates around the world. He welcomed the Government’s decision to cut corporation tax from 28% in recognising the need to keep the UK competitive rather than attempting to defend high tax rates by criticizing tax competition.

During the debate, Field highlighted conclusions reached by the Foot Review on the UK’s relationship with its Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories. In particular, Field pointed out that there is limited impact on the UK’s tax base as a result of so-called ‘tax havens’.

He highlighted that while the TUC has argued that the tax gap created in UK government tax receipts as a result of offshore centres is GBP25bn, the Deloitte Report, commissioned by the UK Treasury at the time of the Foot Report, showed that only GBP2bn is potentially lost in tax leakages per annum – though this figure could be lower.

Field also noted that many small IFCs are able to offer stable, well-regulated and neutral jurisdictions through which to facilitate cross-border business for the benefit of the global economy, pointing out that a number of academic studies have concluded that small IFCs create jobs within financial centres and in domestic economies; and can help poverty alleviation in developing countries. He argued that as a major net recipient of capital flows from small IFCs, the UK would suffer if its firms were to find it more difficult to access capital via the international markets.

During the debate, it was also stressed that the Financial Action Taskforce gives many small IFCs a positive assessment in meeting its 49 recommendations – including measures to avoid concealing financial crime and terrorist financing. Field also pointed out work being carried out by the Commonwealth Secretariat in illustrating the important role that small IFCs play in developing economic development and prosperity.

Finally, on policy decisions going forward, Field argued that the OECD do not operate with the sort of transparency that they would expect of others and called for the government to outline measures it can take to ensure that the G-20 process is more inclusive.

In response to the debate, Mark Hoban the Financial Secretary to the UK Treasury agreed that the UK is uniquely placed in this debate in having a constitutional relationship, through its Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories, with half of the top 30 offshore financial centres. The UK is also, he explained, a major recipient of investment capital raised through small IFCs. He acknowledged the important contribution played by small IFCs to market liquidity in the UK, as well as the important link to the UK retail financial services market.

The minister also argued that it was crucial that the small IFCs were fully engaged in the process of raising global standards on regulation and transparency on issues such as prudential standards, anti-money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. He recognised the efforts made by small IFCs to date and welcomed further efforts towards progress in this area. He also supported the call for a balanced debate in arguing that it was important that the UK government, the EU and the G-20 proceed on an evidence-based approach.