It has recently emerged that the Swiss Federal Council is to put the Administrative
Assistance Agreement between Switzerland and the US, dated August 19, 2009,
to the Swiss parliament for formal approval. The Federal Department of Justice
and Police has therefore been instructed to prepare the corresponding Federal
Council Message.
The Federal Council’s decision will allow Switzerland to fulfill its obligations
under international law, and bring a final resolution to its legal and sovereignty
dispute with the US.
According to the Federal Council, this process means that in any future appeals,
the Court will then no longer be able to regard the UBS Agreement as merely a
mutual agreement. Instead, it will stand as a treaty of the same status as the
older and more general bilateral double taxation convention. Indeed, according
to the general rules of interpretation, it would also take precedence over the
latter. As a result, Switzerland will be in a position to provide treaty assistance
not only in cases of tax fraud, but also in cases of continued and serious tax
evasion.
According to the statement by the Swiss Federal Administration: “A number
of formal amendments must be made to remedy the shortcomings in the Agreement
that were established by the Federal Administrative Court. In addition, a further
amendment - to be made following consultations with the Chairman of the responsible
Committees - will allow the Agreement to be applied provisionally as soon as an
amending protocol is signed.”
It continues: “This authority is granted to the Federal Council under the
Federal Government and Administration Act in order to safeguard important Swiss
interests in cases of particular urgency. The amending protocol is expected to
be signed in March. The Federal Council will then submit its message on the UBS
Agreement and the amending protocol to Parliament. In the view of the Federal
Council, these treaty texts do not require an optional referendum, since the UBS
Agreement concerns only one request for information and is limited in duration.
Furthermore, unlike the revised bilateral double taxation convention, which is
subject to an optional referendum, it does not govern future treaty assistance
arrangements with the USA in the general and abstract sense. Rather, it resolves
the legal and sovereignty dispute with the USA in a specific case.”
The Federal Administration has also made known that the Swiss Federal Tax Administration
(SFTA) will immediately commence final decisions in cases of tax fraud, as well
as negative final decisions in cases in which the conditions for granting treaty
assistance are not satisfied. It will not, however, issue final decisions on the
other cases. Furthermore, it will not transfer any data to the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on the basis
of final decisions that have become legally enforceable, unless the person concerned
has given their express consent. Once the amending protocol has been signed, the
SFTA will also commence final decisions in cases of continued and serious tax
evasion.
According to the Administration, by handling matters in this way, Switzerland
will be able to process the US request for information by the end of August 2010
deadline, as set in the agreement. It notes however, that the SFTA will not pass
any data on to the IRS until the UBS Agreement has been approved by Parliament.
The only exceptions to this rule are those cases in which the person concerned
has given their express consent to the data transfer, or has reported themselves
to the IRS under the latter's voluntary disclosure program.