The South African Revenue Service (SARS) and the National Treasury have proposed
a new short-term solution for businesses that have problems with the proposed
anti-avoidance measures that are to be inserted into the 2011 Taxation Laws
Amendment Bill and are intended to ensure the free movement of tax-neutral assets
between members of a corporate group.
The government has been concerned about the use of Section 45 of the country’s
tax code as a tax-free mechanism to obtain interest deductions linked to excessive
debt (and other hybrid instruments masquerading as debt) in facilitating, for
example, leveraged buyouts and other restructuring.
SARS and the National Treasury suspended the operation of Section 45 in June
this year for an 18-month period, in order, it was said, to protect tax revenues
from a potential loss of between ZAR3bn (USD437.5m) and ZAR5bn.
The government then announced an accelerated consultation process on the proposed
anti-avoidance measures. While reiterating their commitment to the rollover
relief provisions and the need to ensure that “non-cash out” mergers
and acquisitions should ideally be free from an immediate tax charge, they confirmed
that seemingly neutral transactions cannot be condoned if these transactions
set the stage for future tax losses (or other tax benefits) via excessive leverage.
A short, accelerated consultation period was held until July 8, but was said
to have merely confirmed the opinion of SARs and the National Treasury that
controls were needed on excessive debt. However, given the additional information
therein provided, a solution is now being proposed for the short term.
It is hoped that the short-term solution “should better accommodate the
pressing needs of the business community while simultaneously providing effective
interim protection for fiscus. Commercially orientated transactions must be
allowed to proceed as long as such transactions do not contain unacceptable
tax leakage.”
It is proposed that a section be introduced to control the interest deductions
associated with debt used to fund the acquisition of assets. Transactions will
follow different channels, in that, for example, interest deductions arising
from transactions in a ‘green’ channel, where there is no revenue
loss (or the possibility of loss) will be automatically permissible.
Interest deductions on associated debt for so-called ‘amber’ transactions
will only be permitted upon pre-approval, and transactions that are not approved
will not be permitted an interest deduction. This approach, it was pointed out,
is guided by the need to reduce administrative burdens for most legitimate transactions.
It was reiterated that the government’s goal was never to impede commercially-drive
transactions, but merely to prevent certain taxpayers and their advisors from
exploiting weaknesses in the tax system.
A longer-term set of solutions to deal with excessive debt and the characterisation
of debt is still planned for 2012 and beyond. The government remains committed
to allowing the use of Section 45 to facilitate the tax neutral movement of
assets between members of a group of companies, which do not give rise to artificial
structuring to avoid paying taxes, but SARS will, in the meantime, “continue
to investigate a number of pre-existing aggressive transactions that deliberately
avoid paying their fair share of the tax burden.”