With just two weeks to go before the start of two separate offshore tax amnesty
schemes in the UK, PKF accountants and business advisers is urging HM Revenue
and Customs (HMRC) to clarify why Liechtenstein account holders are being given
an advantage.
The New Disclosure Opportunity (NDO) scheme, first announced in last April’s
budget and aimed at those with undisclosed assets and income held offshore,
is due to commence on September 1, as is the more recently announced Liechtenstein
Disclosure Facility (LDF) - aimed specifically at those with accounts in Liechtenstein
as part of a tax agreement between the UK and the alpine jurisdiction. However,
PKF is concerned that the LDF’s more generous terms leaves those intending
to file under the NDO at an unfair disadvantage and is urging HMRC to level
the playing field.
“The announcement of the Liechtenstein amnesty threw open many questions
about the disparity of its terms with that of the previously announced NDO,”
said John Cassidy, Tax Investigations partner at PKF.
“Indeed, whilst the notes to editors at the bottom of HMRC’s Liechtenstein
announcement state that the investments have to be in Liechtenstein on 1 August
2009 for the investors to qualify for the amnesty from 1 September, they also
state clearly that if the investments are moved into Liechtenstein after that
date, the investor can still participate in the Liechtenstein amnesty from 1
December. This clearly gives the green light for all offshore investors to use
the more favourable Liechtenstein terms, if they move their money between now
and 1 December 2009," Cassidy added.
“I urge HMRC to both issue some clear guidance laying out exactly what
investors can and cannot do and align the terms of the NDO with the Liechtenstein
amnesty as this is more likely to encourage investors to use the facility leading
to a bigger tax take for HMRC,” he said.
The LDF agreement, signed by the two governments on August 11 alongside a broader
Tax and Information Exchange Agreement, will allow penalties on unpaid tax to
be capped at 10% of tax evaded over the last 10 years, providing that the account
holder makes a full disclosure to HMRC before March 31, 2015. The NDO, the notification
period for which closes after November 30, 2009, also caps penalties at 10%
in most cases, but has a recovery period going back 20 years. Taxpayers disclosing
under the LDF can also elect to apply a special composite rate of 40% to cover
all taxes on an annual basis without the benefit of any relief or deduction.
However, according to the Memorandum of Understanding establishing the LDF,
where a person has an investment opened through a UK branch or agency, they
will not benefit from the terms of the LDF.
The preamble to the MoU states: “A person who participates in the disclosure
facility and has a bank account, including a financial (portfolio) account,
outside the UK or Liechtenstein which is in his name and was opened through
a UK branch or agency of that bank, will not, in relation to that account, be
eligible for the shorter limitation period, the fixed penalty and the composite
rate option provided under the disclosure facility and as referred to in paragraphs
5 and 6 of Schedule 7.”
The LDF is available to all persons with new or existing fiduciary, company
or other holding structures or financial accounts in Liechtenstein during the
five-year period, subject to the following provisions:
- Any person already under investigation by HMRC as of the date of signing
of this MOU cannot participate in the disclosure facility;
- Any person who was previously under investigation by HMRC and who knowingly
did not disclose his interest in any relevant property will be able to participate
in the disclosure facility but will not be able to benefit from the limited
penalty provided for in the disclosure facility;
- Any person previously contacted by HMRC under the terms of the Offshore
Disclosure Facility or the New Disclosure Opportunity will be able to participate
in the disclosure facility but will not be able to benefit from the limited
penalty provided for in the disclosure facility. The relevant penalty will
not, however, be higher than the penalty provided for under the New Disclosure
Opportunity.