The European Commission has requested that Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland
and Austria change certain aspects of their legislation which are not in compliance
with EU rules on value-added tax (VAT). The
Commission's requests take the form of reasoned opinions (second step of EU
infringement proceedings). In the absence of satisfactory responses within two
months, the Commission may refer these member states to the Court of Justice.
The Commission has given Ireland two months to amend its legislation which
grants a reduced VAT rate of 4.8% to the supply of horses and greyhounds, the
hiring of horses and the sale of nomination services in studs.
Under the VAT Directive, member states can continue to apply exemptions or
reduced rates that already existed on January 1, 1991, so long as they are in
line with EU legislation and were adopted for clearly defined social reasons
and to the benefit of the final consumer. Although Ireland did apply the reduced
rate to horses and greyhounds before 1991, the Commission considers that this
measure does not fit the requirement of having a clearly defined social reason,
nor does it seem to benefit the final consumer. Therefore it is not compatible
with EU legislation, the Commission considers.
The Commission has formally requested that the Netherlands change its legislation
with regard to VAT exemptions for sports activities (water sports), as the scope
of the exemption is considered to be too wide.
Under the VAT Directive, services linked to sport or physical education, which
are supplied by non-profit making organizations to the persons taking part in
these sports, can be exempt from VAT. In the Netherlands, a VAT exemption is
granted to services provided by water sports organizations related to the provision
of berths and moorings for vessels. The Commission considers that the VAT exemption
should not be applied to the provision of berths or moorings, because such services
cannot be considered as closely linked to sport or physical education. Furthermore,
the way in which the Netherlands distinguishes between organizations which can
and cannot benefit from the VAT exemption is not in line with the VAT Directive
and threatens to distort competition, the Commission said.
In the case of Poland, the Commission has formally requested that the country
amend its legislation on VAT exemptions for transactions related to aircraft,
since it is based on criteria which are different from, and inconsistent with,
the criteria set out in EU legislation.
Under the VAT Directive, certain supplies of goods and services related to
aircraft can be exempt from VAT. The essential condition for those exemptions
is that the aircraft must be "used by an airline operating for profit chiefly
on international routes." Even aircraft which operate on domestic routes
can benefit from the exemption, so long as they are owned by airlines that profit
mainly from international traffic.
Poland gives the exemption to aircraft which weigh more than
12 tonnes. Any aircraft under this weight does not benefit from the exemption
in Poland, even if it meets the criteria set out in the EU legislation. Conversely,
aircraft over 12 tonnes which do not meet the EU criteria are still given an
exemption in Poland. In view of the above, the Commission has formally requested
Poland to change its national rules, to bring them into line with the EU legislation.
The Commission has formally requested Austria to change its legislation with
regard to VAT exemptions for aircraft used by state institutions. Under Austrian
law, the supply, modification, repair, maintenance, chartering and hiring of
aircraft used by state institutions are exempt from VAT, as are the intra-Community
acquisition and the importation of goods relating to such transactions. This
is not in line with EU criteria for VAT exemptions for aircraft (as detailed
above), which member states must respect. The Commission has therefore formally
requested that Austria amends its legislation within two months.